JB Handley did this interview on CNN and sold out every autistic child with some very good lying. Handley's lies of omission here are exactly what the vaccine makers want so they can cause more brain damage to babies.
Handley claims that the only vaccine that has ever been studied is the MMR shot. He knows this is false so it's an outright and blatant lie. Verstraeten did the study in 1999 that showed us thimerosal (mercury) was the cause of autism based on his study of the DTP shot which contained 25 micrograms of thimerosal. It was because of this knowledge that we began to cure autism by removing mercury from our childrens' brains. Many of us have succeeded in curing our children to differing degrees by removing that mercury. That confirms mercury as the cause so one has to ask why Mr Handley now decides to ignore this fact.
If Handley was honest, he would be mentioning facts concerning mercury. He would mention the fact that no vaccine ever caused autism for 133 years until mercury was added as a preservative in 1931. In fact, nothing ever caused autism before 1931 because autism did not exist until then. He should be mentioning the fact that there was zero cases of autism in New Hampshire and Mississippi in 1993 and that those states, all of a sudden had hundreds of cases in 1994, exactly three years after the HepB shot was added to the vaccine schedule in 1991. He may be aware that newborns do not have a blood brain barrier and that shooting mercury into them as soon as they were born was an excellent way to place mercury in their brains and cause permanent damage. The key here, and Handley must be aware of this, is that the mercury in the flu shot to pregnant women is incredibly hazardous to fetuses. If mercury from the HepB shot could cause the largest increase in autism that was ever seen in 1994 by shooting newborns with mercury, can't he fathom that shooting twice as much mercury into fetuses through the mothers' flu shots would have much more damaging results? One would think a Stanford graduate could make this connection.
Instead of making these arguments that seem to be common sense to me, Handley is now off on this crazy tangent of making comparisons between numbers of vaccines that contain no mercury, or very little mercury and are mostly given to babies after they have developed a blood brain barrier. At no point in this interview or other TV interviews that he has done lately for CNN and a show that I think is called "The Doctors" did Handley mention the flu shot and the full dose of mercury that those shots still contain.
If you were a CEO of vaccine manufacturing company, a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study is exactly what you would want to prove that vaccines do not cause autism. Of course, you would want that study done on children who were born since most of the thimerosal was reduced to trace levels in most vaccines. The results would show some autism in unvaccinated children since some would have had mothers who had the flu shot while pregnant. Lots of mothers are now full of mercury themselves since they were babies when the number of vaccines began increasing and they would pass some of that to their fetuses and to their newborns through breastfeeding. Pharma could easily cherry pick subjects for this study and be sure to include autistic kids whose mothers had flu shots but did not vaccinate their babies. Voila, they find unvaccinated kids with autism and they have a perfect study to declare that vaccines do not cause autism. And, they have JB Handley who stated in this video that he would admit vaccines do not cause autism if this study produced those results.
If JB Handley had any guts or honesty in his character, he would have stated the facts about mercury and he would have mentioned the flu shot and drilled that point home in no uncertain terms. The fact that he didn't do that tells you he's a liar.